National Rankings - USA
By Alfred North and Jean Pierre Palazy

USA Nationals World Championships Olympics Pan American Games Commonwealth
US National Rankings World Class Rankings UCI World Class Rankings UCI World Cup Rankings
US National Championships (RR) US National Championships (TT) US National Championships (Criterium)

National Racing Calendar Rankings (NRC) Here!

1989 Points
1. Inga Thompson
237
2. Susan Elias
212
3. Sally Zack
162
4. Katrin Tobin
138
5. Jeanne Golay
128
6. Bunki Bankaitis (Davis)
119
7. Peggy Maas
90
8. Ruthes Matthes
87
9. Phyllis Hines
79
10. Jane Marshall
75
1990 Points
1. Ruthie Matthes
401
2. Inga Thompson
275
3. Susan Elias
257
4. Karin Tobin
216
5. Phyllis Hines
171
6. Maureen Manly
170
7. Bunki Bankaitis (Davis)
153
8. Linda Brenneman
125
9. Eve Stephenson
121
10. Marion Clignet
93
1991 Points
1. Sally Zack
387
2. Inga Thompson
351
3. Karen Bliss
290
4. Maureen Manly
269
5. Dede Demet
199
6. Julie Young
192
7. Eve Stephenson
187
8. Janie Eickhoff
153
9. Linda Brenneman
139
10. Ruthie Matthes
109
1992 Points
1. Inga Thompson
429
2. Jeanne Golay
408
3. Eve Stephenson
350
4. Sally Zack
265
5. Bunki Bankaitis (Davis)
186
6. Julie Young
185
7. Janice Bolland
133
8. Laura Charameda
93
9. Alison Dunlap
85
10. Karen Bliss
81
1993
Points
1. Laura Charameda
249
2. Allison Dunlap
163
3. Eve Stephenson
143
4. Janice Bolland
129
5. Jeanne Golay
120
6. Rebecca Twigg
120
7. Sally Zack
119
8. Karen Kurreck (Brems)
97
9. Julie Young
70
10. Shari Kain Rodgers
68
1994
Points
1. Jeanne Golay
419
2. Dede Demet Barry
254
3. Alison Dunlap
214
4. Karen Kurreck (Brems)
195
5. Julie Young
184
6. Eve Stephenson
142
7. Laura Charameda
72
8. Carmen Richardson
71
9. Janie Eickhoff
50
10. Karen Dunne
43
1995
Points
1. Jeanne Golay
590
2. Dede Demet Barry
528
3. Laura Charameda
371
4. Karen Kurreck (Brems)
259
5. Julie Young
144
6. Mari Paulson (Holden)
127
7. Elizabeth Emery
97
8. Rebecca Twigg
96
9. Eve Stephenson
73
10. Louisa Jenkins
69
1996
Points
1. Laura Charameda
368
2. Alison Dunlap
273
3. Dede Demet Barry
233
4. Linda Brenneman
193
5. Karen Kurreck (Brems)
170
6. Jeanne Golay
160
7. Mari Holden
73
8. Pam Schuster
52
9. Heather Albert Hall
46
10. Janie Eickhoff
45
1997
Points
1. Karen Kurreck
374
2. Dede Demet Barry
275
3. Karen Livingston Bliss
199
4. Mari Holden
141
5. Elizabeth Emery
129
6. Kendra Wenzel Kneeland
122
7. Pam Schuster
121
8. Louisa Jenkins
102
9. Alison Dunlap
68
10. Giana Roberge
61
1998
Points
1. Dede Demet Barry
299
2. Mari Holden
246
3. Pam Schuster
217
4. Karen Kurreck
164
5. Emily Robbins
120
6. Alison Dunlap
112
7. Kendra Wenzel Kneeland
89
8. Karen Livingston Bliss
77
9. Julie Young
76
10. Joan Wilson
74
1999
Points
1. Mari Holden
439
2. Elizabeth Emery
233
3. Karen Kurreck
201
4. Emily Robbins
179
5. Karen Dunne
148
6. Julie Young
128
7. Alison Dunlap
113
8. Pam Schuster
111
9. Dede Demet Barry
101
10. Kimberly Bruckner
93
2000
Points
1. Mari Holden
485
2. Dede Demet Barry
231
3. Tina Pic Mayolo
193
4. Pam Schuster
167
5. Julie Young
157
6. Alison Dunlap
155
7. Kimberly Smith
154
8. Karen Kurreck
137
9. Catherine Cardwell
127
10. Kimberly Bruckner
107
2001
Points
1. Kimberly Bruckner
513
2. Katrina Berger
223
3. Mari Holden
202
4. Amber Neben
200
5. Kimberly Smith
173
6. Julie Young
165
7. Jessica Phillips
149
8. Alison Dunlap
121
9. Tina Pic Mayolo
84
10. Lara Ruthven
82
2002
Points
1. Kimberly Bruckner
321
2. Amber Neben
209
3. Dede Demet Barry
154
4. Jessica Phillips
133
5. Tina Pic Mayolo
120
6. Laura Van Gilder
117
7. Kim Anderson
103
8. Heather Albert
101
9. Mari Holden
79
10. Ronda Quick
49
2003
Points
1. Kimberly Bruckner
273
2. Dede Barry
266
3. Amber Neben
262
4. Kristen Armstrong
187
5. Tina Pic Mayolo
93
6. Lynn Gaggioli
89
7. Katrina Grove
73
8. Kim Anderson
59
9. Heather Albert
45
10. Meredith Miller
40
2004
Points
1. Dede Demet Barry
414
2. Kristin Armstrong
369
3. Christine Thorburn
346
4. Tina Pic Mayolo
247
5. Amber Neben
181
6. Katrina Berger
158
7. Lynn Gaggioli
128
8. Kimberly Bruckner
118
9. Brooke Qurada
85
10. Kim Anderson
71
2005
Points
1. Christine Thorburn
441
2. Amber Neben
432
3. Kristin Armstrong
387
4. Tina Pic Mayolo
259
5. Kimberly Baldwin (Bruckner)
210
6. Lynn Gaggioli
141
7. Katheryn Curi, Kori Seehafer
117
8. Grace Fleury
69
9. Laura Van Gilder
58
10. Chrissy Ruiter
57
2006
Points
1. Amber Neben
586
2. Christine Thorburn
274
3. Kristin Armstrong
387
4. Tina Pic Mayolo
211
5. Kim Anderson
124
6. Kori Seehafer
122
7. Kimberly Bruckner (Baldwin)
120
8. Grace Fleury
93
9. Sarah Hammer
80
10. Laura Van Gilder
77
2007
Points
1. Amber Neben
546
2. Kristin Armstrong
463
3. Mara Abbott
294
4. Christine Thorburn
140
5. Katheryn Curi
116
6. Kori Seehafer
112
7. Kimberly Anderson
104
8. Sarah Hammer
80
9. Alison Powers
65
10. Dotsie Bausch-Cowden
55

These are the U.S. National class rankings for top women riders which were created by Alfred North and Jean Pierre Palazy originally much earlier then the UCI world class women's rankings came about, and they are a useful tool to evaluate riders on a point basis from the races. These tables are very authoritative since Alfred North is one of the top long time record keepers and historians in women's cycling today. Alfred North and Jean Pierre Palazy started the Classments in 1989. These two pioneers are the real holders of the title, but nevertheless they have always said they are the holders and originators of these rankings and they belong to no one else. What the UCI started much later in the 1998 rankings for women and the women's world cup rankings have nothing to do with these rankings, but they are somewhat closely related when you look at the results. The difference is the UCI based its model on a point system in races which it uses to develop a criteria for the World Championships and Olympic Games, and those selections didn't include all the variables in many smaller non sanctioned UCI races and don't include riders who sometimes because they might not of been eligible for some events, were not included. Alfred and John's model includes more points in a more fair and complete World Classment system which include all the relevant variables to insure the results are fair and un-bias. The responsibility of these rankings resides solely with them, as they are the owners and creators of these rankings, but let it be known that they were the first holder and originator of the title, World Classments, or World Class Rankings. Any questions about their validity should be addressed to them, the creators, but you can compare the two models, both the UCI model and their model, for further interest. However their models include not just the top 50 or 100 like the UCI model posts, but many hundreds of riders right down to the last point, including the junior riders, but I am only listing the top ten elite riders here in this table of their work. If you want a complete table, you must contact the authors. Leontien Van Moorsel once said to the president of the UCI Hein Verbruggen in 1993: "The World-wide classification of Alfred North, everyone knows it, but your UCI classification, no one knows it". Jeannie Longo and Elisabeth Chevanne Brunel also admired these rankings, by saying that they are quite uniform and precise while motivating the women to improve.

Introduction To Women's Cycling | Great Women of Cycling | Race History Worldwide
Racing Events Worldwide | Race Winners | Photo Gallery | About This Site | FAQ | Home Page